Stephen muka owned u. s. robotics. he hired his brother chris to work in the company. his letter promised chris $1 million worth of robotics stock at the end of one year, "provided you work reasonably hard and smart at things in the next year." (we should all have such brothers.) chris arrived at robotics and worked the full year, but toward the end of the year, stephen died. his estate refused to give chris the stock, claiming their agreement was a personal satisfaction contract and only stephen could decide whether chris had earned the reward. comment.

What is the communication process? why isnt it possible to communicate without using all the elements in the communication process?

Why should you not sign the tenant landlord agreement quickly and immediately

Who is better at multi-tasking? in business, employees are often asked to perform a complex task when their atten-tion is divided (i.e., multi-tasking). human factors (may 2014) published a study designed to determine whether video game players are better than non–video game play-ers at multi-tasking. each in a sample of 60 college stu-dents was classified as a video game player or a non-player. participants entered a street crossing simulator and were asked to cross a busy street at an unsigned intersec-tion. the simulator was designed to have cars traveling at various high rates of speed in both directions. during the crossing, the students also performed a memory task as a distraction. two variables were measured for each student: (1) a street crossing performance score (measured out of 100 points) and (2) a memory task score (measured out of 20 points). the researchers found no differences in either the street crossing performance or memory task score of video game players and non-gamers. “these results,” say the researchers, “suggest that action video game players [and non-gamers] are equally susceptible to the costs of dividing attention in a complex task”