Kendra owns a sporting goods store. she is in court because of a breach of contract lawsuit against her supplier. one of the terms of the contract is ambiguous. would the court likely permit kendra to testify as to oral conversations about the ambiguous terms of the contract?

Yes, but only to clarify the ambiguous contract terms

Explanation:

Breach of contract is a legitimate reason for activity and a sort of common wrong, wherein a sound understanding of anticipated trade isn't regarded by at least one of the gatherings to the agreement by non-execution or obstruction with the other party's presentation.

A material breach is the most genuine type of break of agreement. In these cases, somebody has failed to maintain their obligations as spread out in the contract. At the point when this happens, the harmed party can seek after harms in a standard suit. In the end, when a contractual worker finishes an undertaking yet isn't paid, this is viewed as a material breach.

answeri believe this is (true );