Ayres services acquired an asset for $80 million in 2018. the asset is depreciated for financial reporting purposes over four years on a straight-line basis (no residual value). for tax purposes the asset’s cost is depreciated by macrs. the enacted tax rate is 40%. amounts for pretax accounting income, depreciation, and taxable income in 2018, 2019, 2020, and 2021 are as follows: ($ in millions) 2018 2019 2020 2021 pretax accounting income $ 330 $ 350 $ 365 $ 400 depreciation on the income statement 20 20 20 20 depreciation on the tax return (25 ) (33 ) (15 ) (7 ) taxable income $ 325 $ 337 $ 370 $ 413 required: determine (a) the temporary book–tax difference for the depreciable asset and (b) the balance to be reported in the deferred tax liability account. (leave no cell blank, enter "0" wherever applicable. show all amounts as positive amounts. enter your answers in millions rounded to 1 decimal place (i. e., 5,500,000 should be entered as 5.

Visburg concrete company pours concrete slabs for single-family dwellings. lancing construction company, which operates outside visburg's normal sales territory, asks visburg to pour 40 slabs for lancing's new development of homes. visburg has the capacity to build 300 slabs and is presently working on 250 of them. lancing is willing to pay only $3, 300 per slab. visburg estimates the cost of a typical job to include unit-level materials, $1, 440: unit-level labor, $720: and an allocated portion of facility-level overhead, $1, 200. required calculate the contribution to profit from the special order. should visburg accept or reject the special order to pour 40 slabs for $3, 300 each?

The management at a pesticide manufacturing company has observed a decline in quality measures. the managers ask robin, the firm's hr manager, to investigate whether training might solve the problem. robin conducts needs assessment and recommends a training plan. which of the following conditions would most likely have been an observation during robin's person analysis?

Alandowner and his neighbor purchased adjoining undeveloped lots. after both built homes on their respective lots, the landowner suggested to the neighbor that a common driveway be built where the two lots joined. the neighbor agreed. the landowner and the neighbor split the cost of constructing the driveway and entered into a written agreement to equally share the costs of its upkeep and maintenance. the agreement was recorded in the county recorder's office. two years later, the neighbor built a new driveway located entirely on his lot. the common driveway, which the landowner continued to use but which the neighbor no longer used, began to deteriorate. the landowner asked the neighbor for money to maintain the common driveway, but the neighbor refused to contribute. three years later, the neighbor conveyed his lot to a friend. the friend entered into possession and used only the driveway built by the neighbor. by this time, the common driveway had deteriorated badly and contained numerous potholes. the landowner asked the friend to pay half of what it would take to repair the common driveway. the friend refused. the landowner repaired the driveway and sued the friend for 50% of the cost of repairs. will the landowner prevail?