Leonard kranzler loaned lewis saltzman $100,000. saltzman made fifteen payments on the loan, but this did not repay the entire amount. more than ten years after the date of the loan, but less than two years after the date of the last payment, kranzler filed a suit against saltzman to recover the outstanding balance. saltzman claimed that the suit was barred by a ten-year statute of limitations. does kranzler need to prove a new promise with new consideration to collect the unpaid debt?

John novosel was employed by nationwide insurance company for fifteen years. novosel had been a model employee and, at the time of discharge, was a district claims manager and a candidate for the position of division claims manager. during novosel's fifteenth year of employment, nationwide circulated a memorandum requesting the participation of all employees in an effort to lobby the pennsylvania state legislature for the passage of a certain bill before the body. novosel, who had privately indicated his disagreement with nationwide's political views, refused to lend his support to the lobby, and his employment with nationwide was terminated. novosel brought two separate claims against nationwide, arguing, first, that his discharge for refusing to lobby the state legislature on behalf of nationwide constituted the tort of wrongful discharge in that it was arbitrary, malicious, and contrary to public policy. novosel also contended that nationwide breached an implied contract guaranteeing continued employment so long as his job performance was satisfactory. what decision as to each claim?

Which of the following is a problem for the production of public goods?

Paid-in-capital in excess of par represents the amount of proceeds a. from the original sale of common stock b. in excess of the par value from the original sale of common stock c. at the current market value of the common stock d. at the curent book value of the common stock