subject
Business, 07.11.2019 00:31 balakrishnamanoharan

Not so rich uncle. bruce is attempting to convince sally to marry him. he promises her that if she will marry him, he will buy a new mercedes automobile for her within six months of the marriage and take her on a world tour within a year of the marriage date. sally reluctantly agrees, and they sign an agreement by which bruce agrees to provide the mercedes and world tour. bruce and sally marry on january 1. unexpectedly, on march 1, bruce's supposedly rich uncle, frank, dies. frank has no living relatives other than bruce, and frank's will leaves everything to bruce who is also appointed executor. in attempting to settle the estate, bruce agrees orally to pay out of his own pocket debts of frank totaling $10,000. sally is concerned about bruce's doing so. bruce tells her not to worry because he will get all the money back when the estate settles. bruce admits to a number of friends that he agreed to settle the debts out of his own pocket because he needed to obtain assets from the estate in a hurry. the assets were needed in large part to satisfy his obligations to sally. surprisingly, it later came to light that prior to his death frank had signed away all his assets to his girlfriend in argentina. there was nothing left in the estate for bruce to inherit. bruce disavowed his agreement to pay $10,000 to various creditors. which of the following is true regarding bruce's promises to sally of a mercedes and a trip?

the promises would have fallen within the statute of frauds in earlier times in history, but would not fall within the statute of frauds in this day and time.

the promise regarding the mercedes falls within the statute of frauds but the promise regarding the trip does not.

the promise regarding the trip falls within the statute of frauds but the promise regarding the mercedes does not.

the promises do not fall within the statute of frauds because they involve material matters, not matters involving home and children.

the promises fall within the statute of frauds.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Business

question
Business, 22.06.2019 00:30
Salty sensations snacks company manufactures three types of snack foods: tortilla chips, potato chips, and pretzels. the company has budgeted the following costs for the upcoming period: 1 factory depreciation $33,782.00 2 indirect labor 84,456.00 3 factory electricity 8,446.00 4 indirect materials 40,356.00 5 selling expenses 26,900.00 6 administrative expenses 17,200.00 7 total costs $211,140.00 factory overhead is allocated to the three products on the basis of processing hours. the products had the following production budget and processing hours per case: budgeted volume (cases) processing hours per case tortilla chips 3,600 0.25 potato chips 5,300 0.11 pretzels 2,300 0.49 total 11,200 required: a. determine the single plantwide factory overhead rate.* b. use the factory overhead rate in (a) to determine the amount of total and per-case factory overhead allocated to each of the three products under generally accepted accounting principles. refer to the amount descriptions list provided for the exact wording of the answer choices for text entries.* * if required, round your answers to the nearest cen
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 03:30
Assume that all of thurmond company’s sales are credit sales. it has been the practice of thurmond company to provide for uncollectible accounts expense at the rate of one-half of one percent of net credit sales. for the year 20x1 the company had net credit sales of $2,021,000 and the allowance for doubtful accounts account had a credit balance, before adjustments, of $630 as of december 31, 20x1. during 20x2, the following selected transactions occurred: jan. 20 the account of h. scott, a deceased customer who owed $325, was determined to be uncollectible and was therefore written off. mar. 16 informed that a. nettles, a customer, had been declared bankrupt. his account for $898 was written off. apr. 23 the $906 account of j. kenney & sons was written off as uncollectible. aug. 3 wrote off as uncollectible the $750 account of clarke company. oct. 20 wrote off as uncollectible the $1,130 account of g. michael associates. oct. 27 received a check for $325 from the estate of h. scott. this amount had been written off on january 20 of the current year. dec. 20 cater company paid $7,000 of the $7,500 it owed thurmond company. since cater company was going out of business, the $500 balance it still owed was deemed uncollectible and written off. required: prepare journal entries for the december 31, 20x1, and the seven 20x2 transactions on the work sheets provided at the back of this unit. then answer questions 8 and 9 on the answer sheet. t-accounts are also provided for your use in answering these questions. 8. which one of the following entries should have been made on december 31, 20x1?
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 11:20
Camilo is a self-employed roofer. he reported a profit of $30,000 on his schedule c. he had other taxable income of $5,000. he paid $3,000 for hospitalization insurance. his self-employment tax was $4,656. he paid his former wife $4,000 in court-ordered alimony and $4,000 in child support. what is the amount camilo can deduct in arriving at adjusted gross income (agi)?
Answers: 2
question
Business, 22.06.2019 19:00
When making broccoli cream soup, the broccoli and aromatics should be a. burned. b. simmered. c. puréed. d. sweated.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Not so rich uncle. bruce is attempting to convince sally to marry him. he promises her that if she w...
Questions
Questions on the website: 13722361