subject
Business, 10.11.2019 07:31 karissanichole18

The note about debt included in the financial statements of healds company for the year ended december 31, 2017, disclosing the following: 8.15% notes due 2018 $218,400,000 8.65% notes due 2023 $362,200,000 8.90% notes due 2032 $243,000,000 8.53% notes due 2040 $218,000,000 7.45% notes due 2019 $ 26,800,000 the above table summarizes the long term debt of the company at december 31, 2017. all of the notes were originally at their face (maturity) value and have been gradually repaid over time so that these amounts are remaining balances at this date. assuming that the notes pay interest annually and mature on december 31 of the respective year. (fv of $1, pv of 1, fva of $1, pva of $1, fvad of $1, pvad of $1) required:
1) suppose that healdsburg wants to pay off the 8.65% notes on december 31, 2018. (i. e. five years early) when the going interest rate is 5%, thereby retiring the $362,000,000 in debt. how much would healdsburg have to pay for the notes (principal only) on this date in order to satisfy the note holders.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Business

question
Business, 21.06.2019 22:20
Steele bicycle manufacturing company currently produces the handlebars used in manufacturing its bicycles, which are high-quality racing bikes with limited sales. steele produces and sells only 10,000 bikes each year. due to the low volume of activity, steele is unable to obtain the economies of scale that larger producers achieve. for example, steele could buy the handlebars for $31 each: they cost $34 each to make. the following is a detailed breakdown of current production costs: after seeing these figures, steele's president remarked that it would be foolish for the company to continue to produce the handlebars at $34 each when it can buy them for $31 each. calculate the total relevant cost. do you agree with the president's conclusion?
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 07:10
mark, a civil engineer, entered into a contract with david. as per the contract, mark agreed to design and build a house for david for a specified fee. mark provided david with an estimation of the total cost and the contract was mutually agreed upon. however, during construction, when mark increased the price due to a miscalculation on his part, david refused to pay the amount. this scenario is an example of a mistake.
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 20:00
Because this market is a monopolistically competitive market, you can tell that it is in long-run equilibrium by the fact thatmr=mc at the optimal quantity for each firm. furthermore, a monopolistically competitive firm's average total cost in long-run equilibrium isless than the minimum average total cost. true or false: this indicates that there is a markup on marginal cost in the market for engines. true false monopolistic competition may also be socially inefficient because there are too many or too few firms in the market. the presence of the externality implies that there is too little entry of new firms in the market.
Answers: 3
question
Business, 22.06.2019 22:30
The answer here, x=7, is not in the interval that you selected in the previous part. what is wrong with the work shown above?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
The note about debt included in the financial statements of healds company for the year ended decemb...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 11.10.2019 23:30
question
Mathematics, 11.10.2019 23:30
question
Mathematics, 11.10.2019 23:30
question
Spanish, 11.10.2019 23:30
question
Mathematics, 11.10.2019 23:30
Questions on the website: 13722363