Michael is a manager of a landscaping business. during a particularly dry season, he realized that he had the opportunity to increase his sales if he could find a way to ensure that his plants would stay in bloom despite the dry conditions. he brainstormed with his employees and the best two ideas they had were to develop an innovative irrigation system to water the plants from underground and to focus on selling dry-weather plants. he determined that the underground irrigation system would be too expensive for his customers, so he decided to focus on selling dry-weather plants. he found a new supplier of dry-weather plants and had his employees focus on selling them to existing and new customers. what must michael do to determine if his decision accomplished the desired result?

How did lani lazzari show her investors she was a good investment? (site 1)

In december of 2004, the company you own entered into a 20-year contract with a grain supplier for daily deliveries of grain to its hot dog bun manufacturing facility. the contract called for "10,000 pounds of grain" to be delivered to the facility at the price of $100,000 per day. until february 2017, the supplier provided processed grain which could easily be used in your manufacturing process. however, no longer wanting to absorb the cost of having the grain processed, the supplier began delivering whole grain. the supplier is arguing that the contract does not specify the type of grain that would be supplied and that it has not breached the contract. your company is arguing that the supplier has an onsite processing plant and processed grain was implicit to the terms of the contract. over the remaining term of the contract, reshipping and having the grain processed would cost your company approximately $10,000,000, opposed to a cost of around $1,000,000 to the supplier. after speaking with in-house counsel, it was estimated that litigation would cost the company several million dollars and last for years. weighing the costs of litigation, along with possible ambiguity in the contract, what are three options you could take to resolve the dispute? which would be the best option for your business and why?

One of your new suppliers, kim, has been hearing rumors about your firm’s lack of capability to deliver high quality products and writes an email asking you to address the claims being made. in replying to her, you want to be sure that you are very clear and leave no room for misinterpretation. which of the following aspects of effective communication should you give the most attention? (a) making sure you understand kim’s areas of expertise. (b) supporting your reply with relevant data and facts. (c) establishing your credibility as an expert. (d) paying attention to implied communications.