Hall-mark regularly supplied electronic parts to peter lee. on september 11, 1992, lee gave hall-mark a $100,000 check for parts it had received. hall-mark continued to ship parts to lee. on september 23, 1992, lee’s check was dishonored by the bank. on september 25, 1992, lee delivered to hall-mark a cashier’s check for $100,000. hall-mark shipped nothing more to lee after receipt of the cashier’s check. on december 24, 1992, lee filed a voluntary petition for bankruptcy. the trustee filed a complaint to have the $100,000 payment to hall-mark set aside as a voidable preference. hall-mark said it was entitled to the payment because it gave value to lee. the trustee said that the payment was not actually made until the cashier’s check was delivered on september 25, 1992, and that hall-mark gave no further value to lee after that check was paid. who was correct? [in re lee, 108 f.3d 239 (9th cir.)]

With q7 assume the sweet company uses a plantwide predetermined overhead rate with machine-hours as the allocation base.and for q 10,11,13,and 14,assume that the company use department predetermined overhead rates with machine-hours as the allocation bade in both departements.7. assume that sweeten company used cost-plus pricing (and a markup percentage of 80% of total manufacturing cost) to establish selling prices for all of its jobs. what selling price would the company have established for jobs p and q? what are the selling prices for both jobs when stated on a per unit basis assuming 20 units were produced for job p and 30 units were produced for job q? (do not round intermediate calculations. round your final answers to nearest whole dollar.)total price for the job for job p -job q selling price per unit for job p q . how much manufacturing overhead was applied from the molding department to job p and how much was applied to job q? (do not round intermediate calculations.) job p job q manufacturing overhead applied for job p for job q . how much manufacturing overhead was applied from the fabrication department to job p and how much was applied to job q? (do not round intermediate calculations.)job p job q manufacturing overhead applied for job p for job q . if job q included 30 units, what was its unit product cost? (do not round intermediate calculations. round your final answer to nearest whole dollar.)14. assume that sweeten company used cost-plus pricing (and a markup percentage of 80% of total manufacturing cost) to establish selling prices for all of its jobs. what selling price would the company have established for jobs p and q? what are the selling prices for both jobs when stated on a per unit basis assuming 20 units were produced for job p and 30 units were produced for job q? (do not round intermediate calculations. round your final answer to nearest whole dollar.)total price for the job p for job q selling price per unit for job p for job q