The stockholders' equity section on the december 31 balance sheet of chemfast corporation reported the following amounts: contributed capital preferred stock (par $20; authorized 10,000 shares, ? issued, of which 1,000 shares are held as treasury stock) $ 104,000 additional paid-in capital, preferred 14,300 common stock (no-par; authorized 20,000 shares, issued and outstanding 6,000 shares) 600,000 retained earnings 30,000 treasury stock, 1,000 preferred shares at cost (9,500 ) assume that no shares of treasury stock have been sold in the past. required: complete the following statements. (decreases should be indicated by a minus sign. round per share to 2 decimal places.) 1. the number of shares of preferred stock issued was
2. the number of shares of preferred stock outstanding was
3. the average issue price of the preferred stock was per share
4. the average issue price of the common stock was
5. the treasury stock transaction increased (decreased) stockholders’ equity by
6. the treasury stock cost per share
7. total stockholders’ equity is

An object that is clicked on and takes the presentation to a new targeted file is done through a

How did the contribution of the goods producing sector to gdp growth change between 2010 and 2011 a. it fell by 0.3%. b. it fell by 2.3%. c. it rose by 2.3%. d. it rose by 0.6%. the answer is b

David burdick is the ceo of acme bubblegum, a successful public company. as one of the cofounders of the company, burdick has enjoyed speaking and writing about the success of acme bubblegum for several years. typically, he speaks at conferences or directly to the press, but recently, he has been blogging about his firm anonymously. specifically, he defended a recent advertising campaign that was unpopular among consumers and pointedly attacked one of acme bubblegum’s competitors. burdick deeply enjoys his anonymous blogging and believes that none of his readers actually know that he works for acme bubblegum.should burdick be allowed to praise his company’s performance anonymously online? should he be allowed to attack his competitors without disclosing his relationship with the company? how would you feel if the ceo of a company at which you shopped was secretly writing criticisms of his or her competition? how would you feel if you knew a writer for your favorite blog was actually closely involved in a company that the blog discussed? 1. define the ethical issue? 2. who are the primary stakeholders? 3. what are the possible alternatives? 4. how could you evaluate the ethical implications of the alternative actions (use appropriate decision rules)? 5. what action would you recommend and why?