subject
Business, 11.12.2019 21:31 pacoburden02

Which of the following statements is true?

a. consumer surplus under an optimal two-part tariff is greater than that under a single price monopoly pricing.
b. although consumers reap some consumer surplus under a single price monopoly, society is better off with an optimal two-part tariff pricing.
c. consumer surplus under perfect price discrimination is greater than under a single price monopoly pricing.
d. of the three pricing scheduleslong dashsingle price monopoly, an optimal two-part tariff, and perfect price discriminationlong dashprofit is highest under a single-price monopoly pricing.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Business

question
Business, 21.06.2019 21:30
Gary becker's controversial the economics of discrimination concludes that price discrimination has no effect on final profits. price discrimination benefits monopolies. labor discrimination in hiring results in more efficient allocations of production. discrimination in hiring practices has no effect on final profits. labor discrimination harms firms that practice it due to increased labor costs. price discrimination harms monopolies, which refutes over two centuries of economic theory.
Answers: 3
question
Business, 22.06.2019 06:10
Investment x offers to pay you $5,700 per year for 9 years, whereas investment y offers to pay you $8,300 per year for 5 years. if the discount rate is 6 percent, what is the present value of these cash flows? (do not round intermediate calculations and round your answers to 2 decimal places, e.g., 32.16.) present value investment x $ investment y $ if the discount rate is 16 percent, what is the present value of these cash flows? (do not round intermediate calculations and round your answers to 2 decimal places, e.g., 32.16.) present value investment x $ investment y
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 08:20
(05.04 mc) a 2012 report from the u.s. surgeon general stated: "another common practice is strategically locating tobacco-related marketing materials where young children will be exposed to them. tobacco industry executives acknowledge that products and advertising should be placed at eye level (pollay 2007), but in california, 48% of stores had at least one cigarette marketing item at or below 3 feet from the floor (feighery et al. 2001)." it was also noted that 25% of cigarette displays were next to candy. in addition, a national study found that about one-third of the stores had tobacco ads at low heights. after california banned counter displays, some stores place cigarettes in transparent displays so product brands could still be seen. why did some stores use transparent units to display the cigarettes? (3 points) to comply with the new rules while still encouraging cigarette purchases via visual exposure to ensure children and minors are not exposed to cigarettes and their eye-catching packaging to minimize exposure to humidity, extending the shelf life of the cigarettes' tobacco to reduce the occurrence of shoplifting, since cigarettes are high-revenue items
Answers: 3
question
Business, 22.06.2019 15:00
Ineed this asap miguel's boss asks him to distribute information to the entire staff about a mandatory meeting. in 1–2 sentences, describe what miguel should do.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Which of the following statements is true?

a. consumer surplus under an optimal two-pa...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 25.03.2020 21:06
Questions on the website: 13722360