subject
Business, 20.12.2019 02:31 yairreyes01

Drinkable water systems is analyzing a project with projected cash inflows of $127,400, $209,300, and –$46,000 for years 1 to 3, respectively. the project costs $251,000 and has been assigned a discount rate of 12.5 percent. should this project be accepted based on the discounting approach to the modified internal rate of return

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Business

question
Business, 21.06.2019 16:30
Kevin comes across people from various cultures in his job.kevin should deal with people from other cultures with blank . he should communicate by actively
Answers: 3
question
Business, 22.06.2019 08:00
Who is not spending wisely? erika goes shopping and saves her receipts. she totals how much she spent and writes it down. mia needs to buy a new pair of shoes because she joined the soccer team. she looks at newspaper ads to find the best price. lauren has been thinking about getting a puppy for a long time. she walks by the pet store at the mall and decides to get a puppy. erin makes a purchase online using a credit card. she knows that she can pay the entire bill when it arrives.
Answers: 2
question
Business, 22.06.2019 10:30
The rybczynski theorem describes: (a) how commodity price changes influence real factor rewards (b) how commodity price changes influence relative factor rewards. (c) how changes in factor endowments cause changes in commodity outputs. (d) how trade leads to factor price equalization.
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 17:00
Cooper sues company a in state court in south carolina, where he lives, for negligence alleging personal injury and property damage of $100,000 after a truck driven by an employee of company a rear-ended his pickup truck. company a is incorporated in delaware, has its headquarters in new york, but does a substantial amount of business in south carolina. claiming diversity of citizenship, company a seeks removal to federal district court, but cooper opposes the motion. which of the following is true regarding whether the case may be properly removed to federal district court? the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and if company a's nerve center is in a state other than south carolina, then the case may be properly removed to federal court.the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and because company a is incorporated and has its headquarters in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is incorporated in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a's headquarters, nerve center, or principal place of business is located.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is headquartered in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a is incorporated and regardless of the location of its nerve center.because the amount in controversy fails to satisfy jurisdictional requirements, regardless of the location of company a, the case may not be removed to federal court.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Drinkable water systems is analyzing a project with projected cash inflows of $127,400, $209,300, an...
Questions
Questions on the website: 13722363