Investing $2,000,000 in tqm's channel support systems initiative will at a minimum increase demand for your products 3.0% in this and in all future rounds. (refer to the tqm initiative worksheet in the compxm decisions menu.) looking at the round 0 inquirer for andrews, last year's sales were $163,508,343. assuming similar sales next year, the 3.0% increase in demand will provide $4,905,250 of additional revenue. with the overall contribution margin of 34.1%, after direct costs this revenue will add $1,672,690 to the bottom line. for simplicity, assume that the demand increase and margins will remain at last year's levels. how long will it take to achieve payback on the initial $2,000,000 tqm investment, rounded to the nearest month?

tqm investment will not have a significant financial impact
14 months
5 months
10 months

According to this excerpt, a key part of our national security strategy is

The following transactions occurred during july: received $1,000 cash for services provided to a customer during july. received $4,000 cash investment from bob johnson, the owner of the business received $850 from a customer in partial payment of his account receivable which arose from sales in june. provided services to a customer on credit, $475. borrowed $7,000 from the bank by signing a promissory note. received $1,350 cash from a customer for services to be rendered next year. what was the amount of revenue for july?

6. why the aggregate supply curve slopes upward in the short run in the short run, the quantity of output that firms supply can deviate from the natural level of output if the actual price level in the economy deviates from the expected price level. several theories explain how this might happen. for example, the misperceptions theory asserts that changes in the price level can temporarily mislead firms about what is happening to their output prices. consider a soybean farmer who expects a price level of 100 in the coming year. if the actual price level turns out to be 90, soybean prices will , and if the farmer mistakenly assumes that the price of soybeans declined relative to other prices of goods and services, she will respond by the quantity of soybeans supplied. if other producers in this economy mistake changes in the price level for changes in their relative prices, the unexpected decrease in the price level causes the quantity of output supplied to the natural level of output in the short run.