Summarize the consequentialist arguments for and against affirmative action.

Explanation:

Arguments supporting Affirmative Action:

1) Affirmative action is a method that ensure the diversity is obtained and maintained in schools and workplaces. Moreover, it also helps to create tolerant communities therefore, it exposes people to a variety of cultures and ideas that are different from their own.

2)Affirmative action assists disadvantaged people that come from areas of the country where opportunities are limited  be able to advance and they otherwise could not. In other words, it bestows everybody the same playing field.

3)Affirmative action is for  to help by compensating to some races who are"started late in the race" , due to many years of oppression, and it also helps level the playing field.

Arguments against Affirmative Action:

1) Affirmative Action can be described as reverse discrimination. More specifically, past discrimination against some minority groups does not justify existing discrimination against them.

2) It weakens the notion of meritocracy and instead weakens races as a dominant factor in recruitment and recruitment procedures. Regardless of the situation, the best people for the position should be placed there.

3) Students / staff involved in the approval process are often not fully prepared for the assignment.

4) Affirmative Action strengthens stereotypes and racism compared to the previous point. People who give a position almost positively because of their activity are often unsuitable and the idea that all people in this race are "stupid" is endless.

5) People of different races or ethnic backgrounds do not need to have differences of opinion in the workplace / university. People with the same skin color are not necessarily the same in terms of vision or culture.

you get one warning and if you do something to violate the guidelines of after that you get kicked off.

mark as

um sure