Namesh recently sold his ford taurus to a personal friend. namesh’s sale of his automobile illustrates the right to

right to private property

Explanation:

The right to land or the freedom to own properties (cf. ownership) is often regarded as a constitutional right with respect to their belongings by individual citizens. More seldom, a general acceptance of a right to personal property is encountered and is usually heavily restricted such as property is owned via natural persons (i.e. companies) and used for output instead of use.

Article 17 of a Global Declaration of Human Rights acknowledges a benefit to property but is not acknowledged in the Global Convention on Human rights or in the Universal Convention on Financial, Cultural and social Freedom.

all of them make sense but, i would have to say ask someone who has been there/or lives there, and/or read recent newspapers from that city.

hope this !