To address the widespread and growing concern of contaminated food causing serious injury and death to individuals throughout the u. s., congress passes a law which provides that anyone intentionally distributing contaminated food is subject to criminal prosecution, civil fines, or both. congress has provided a safe-harbor provision that any company with a corporate food safety compliance policy approved by the fda may avoid criminal prosecution, but not civil fines. this policy requires a company to report any contamination to the fda so it can be proactive in monitoring any health risks. (note: a safe harbor provision is either a provision included in a law or a rule passed by an administrative agency which states that if an individual or company complies with the law or rule, criminal liability may be avoided if the law is violated).based on these facts, trevor should select one (consider, draft, implement) a corporate food safety compliance policy and select one (enforce the policy, notify the employees of the policy) .in this case, the corporate food safety compliance policy benefit's trevor's company from a/n select one(legal , moral, ethical )perspective, by creating a duty to perform internal tests on food produced at his plant to check for contamination to avoid criminal prosecution. with a corporate food safety compliance policy in place, trevor select one (would, would not ) likely have a legal duty to report the initial test results to the food and drug administration to avoid criminal prosecution. with the new law enacted by congress, it would be select one ( unethical, illegal, both unethical and illegal ) for trevor to sell goods that he knew could cause harm.