Susan used to work as a telemarketer, earning $25,000 per year. She gave up that job to start a catering business. In calculating the economic profit of her catering business, the $25,000 income that she gave up is counted as part of the catering firm's:
a. total revenue
b. implicit costs
c. explicit costs
d. marginal costs

b. implicit costs

Explanation:

Implicit costs refer to opportunity costs. Opportunity cost refers to the monetary value of the options foregone when an individual opts for another option instead.

In the given case, Susan foregone $25000 per year which she was earlier making, in exchange for starting a new catering business. This depicts loss of opportunities foregone in the form of $25,000 income which she could've continued earning had she not decided to shift to catering business.

Thus, $25,000 denotes an implicit or indirect cost incurred for starting the catering business.

1   all nations face the problem of scarcity because there are limited resources and unlimited wants. nations do not have enough factors of production to produce everything that their population wants. entrepreneurial resources initiate businesses to make new goods and services; labor resources produce goods and services.

2 there are four factors of production: natural resources, labor resources, capital resources, and entrepreneurial resources. natural resources are raw materials from nature that are used to produce goods. trees, water, and grains are natural resources. some natural resources, such as wheat and cattle, are renewable

3 wants

things that you do not need to have in order to survive, but would like to have

needs

things that you must have in order to survive

goods

physical products

services

tasks that a business perform for customers

resources

items that people can use to make or obtain what they need or want

determine

to settle or decide by choice of alternatives or possiblities

4 i really dont know

the correct answer is - no.

winnipeg, canada, is not further away from the equator than moscow, russia, in fact moscow is the city that is further away from the equator. moscow is on a latitude of 55.7558° north, while winnipeg is on a latitude of 49.8951° north, thus putting moscow by 5.8607° further away from the equator than winnipeg is.