Previous Question Question 19 of 20 Next Question A landlord is renting out an apartment and has three prospective tenants. The first tenant is willing to pay $1200/month, the second tenant is willing to pay $3000/month, and the third tenant is willing to pay $2000/month. Each potential tenant knows the valuations of the other tenants. Of the following methods of renting the apartment, which would generate the greatest revenue? A sealed first-price auction A sealed second-price (Vickrey) auction A fixed price of $1900/month A fixed price of $2200/month

How should the environmental effects be dealt with when evaluating this project? the environmental effects should be ignored since the plant is legal without mitigation. the environmental effects should be treated as a sunk cost and therefore ignored. if the utility mitigates for the environmental effects, the project is not acceptable. however, before the company chooses to do the project without mitigation, it needs to make sure that any costs of "ill will" for not mitigating for the environmental effects have been considered in the original analysis. the environmental effects should be treated as a remote possibility and should only be considered at the time in which they actually occur. the environmental effects if not mitigated would result in additional cash flows. therefore, since the plant is legal without mitigation, there are no benefits to performing a "no mitigation" analysis.