Amy is trying to decide whether or not it would be beneficial to employ the services of a real estate broker in order to facilitate the sale of her home. She has estimated that the marketing costs and opportunity cost associated with time spent dealing with prospective buyers amounts to $5,000. If Amy were to sell the house on her own for $200,000, but a broker would have been able to negotiate a higher price of $206,350, what commission rate should Amy have been willing to accept from a real estate broker to make her indifferent between selling the house on her own and hiring a real estate broker

David burdick is the ceo of acme bubblegum, a successful public company. as one of the cofounders of the company, burdick has enjoyed speaking and writing about the success of acme bubblegum for several years. typically, he speaks at conferences or directly to the press, but recently, he has been blogging about his firm anonymously. specifically, he defended a recent advertising campaign that was unpopular among consumers and pointedly attacked one of acme bubblegum’s competitors. burdick deeply enjoys his anonymous blogging and believes that none of his readers actually know that he works for acme bubblegum.should burdick be allowed to praise his company’s performance anonymously online? should he be allowed to attack his competitors without disclosing his relationship with the company? how would you feel if the ceo of a company at which you shopped was secretly writing criticisms of his or her competition? how would you feel if you knew a writer for your favorite blog was actually closely involved in a company that the blog discussed? 1. define the ethical issue? 2. who are the primary stakeholders? 3. what are the possible alternatives? 4. how could you evaluate the ethical implications of the alternative actions (use appropriate decision rules)? 5. what action would you recommend and why?