Waterstone, however, posted the anonymous message on the Artists for Justice site and included it in an e-newsletter to subscribers. Waterstone exercised some discretion in choosing which messages to post and send to subscribers, generally omitting those that were unrelated to stolen art. Does Heigl have a valid defamation claim against Waterstone and her website?

a. No, service providers will not be liable for content provided by someone else.
b. Yes, internet service providers will always be liable for defamatory content.
c. No, because the service provider had not been notified that the allegations were untrue.
d. Yes, because the service provider selected which content to post and send to subscribers.