A symbol or mark may act as an individual's signature as per the Statute of Frauds and the UCC's requirement that a written contract must be signed by the party against whom enforcement is sought. A. True B. False

True

Explanation:

The Statute of Frauds requires some type of contracts to be put in writting. Some of theses agreements includes: any goods worth $500 or more, sale of land and contracts that can exceed a year.  Statute of frauds is gotten from an Act of the Parliament of England (29 Chas. 2 c. 3) passed in 1677 (authored by Lord Nottingham assisted by Sir Matthew Hale, Sir Francis North and Sir Leoline Jenkins.

One of the requirement of the written agreements under the Statute is that the signature of both parties involved in the agreement is needed.

True

Explanation:

The statute of frauds is a legal concept that requires certain types of contracts to be executed in writing. Among others, these typically include those for the sale of land, of any goods over $500 in value, and contracts of a year or more in length.

im thinking a but im not 100% sure

explanation: