subject
Business, 15.03.2020 03:02 jenny00qq

Monty Industrial Products Inc. is a diversified industrial-cleaner processing company. The company’s Dargan plant produces two products: a table cleaner and a floor cleaner from a common set of chemical inputs (CDG). Each week, 855,000 ounces of chemical input are processed at a cost of $207,600 into 570,000 ounces of floor cleaner and 285,000 ounces of table cleaner. The floor cleaner has no market value until it is converted into a polish with the trade name FloorShine. The additional processing costs for this conversion amount to $257,800.

FloorShine sells at $20 per 30-ounce bottle. The table cleaner can be sold for $19 per 25-ounce bottle. However, the table cleaner can be converted into two other products by adding 285,000 ounces of another compound (TCP) to the 285,000 ounces of table cleaner. This joint process will yield 285,000 ounces each of table stain remover (TSR) and table polish (TP). The additional processing costs for this process amount to $103,000. Both table products can be sold for $15 per 25-ounce bottle.

The company decided not to process the table cleaner into TSR and TP based on the following analysis.

Process Further
Table
Cleaner Table Stain
Remover (TSR) Table
Polish (TP) Total
Production in ounces 285,000 285,000 285,000
Revenues $216,600 $171,000 $171,000 $342,000
Costs:
CDG costs 69,200 * 51,900 51,900 103,800 **
TCP costs 0 51,500 51,500 103,000
Total costs 69,200 103,400 103,400 206,800
Weekly gross profit $147,400 $67,600 $67,600 $135,200

*If table cleaner is not processed further, it is allocated 1/3 of the $207,600 of CDG cost, which is equal to 1/3 of the total physical output.
**If table cleaner is processed further, total physical output is 1,140,000 ounces. TSR and TP combined account for 50% of the total physical output and are each allocated 25% of the CDG cost.

Partially correct answer. Your answer is partially correct. Try again.

Determine if management made the correct decision to not process the table cleaner further by doing the following.

(1) Calculate the company’s total weekly gross profit assuming the table cleaner is not processed further.

Total weekly gross profit $Entry field with incorrect answer
406600

(2) Calculate the company’s total weekly gross profit assuming the table cleaner is processed further.

Total weekly gross profit $Entry field with incorrect answer
61800

(3) Compare the resulting net incomes and comment on management’s decision.

Management made the Entry field with correct answer decision by choosing to not process table cleaner further.

SHOW SOLUTION
LINK TO TEXT

Incorrect answer. Your answer is incorrect. Try again.

Using incremental analysis, determine if the table cleaner should be processed further. (If amount decreases net income then enter the amount using either a negative sign preceding the number e. g. -45 or parentheses e. g. (45).)

Don’t Process
Table Cleaner
Further Process
Table Cleaner
Further Net Income
Increase
(Decrease)
Incremental revenue $Entry field with incorrect answer
342000
$Entry field with incorrect answer
558000
$Entry field with incorrect answer
238000
Incremental costs Entry field with incorrect answer
69200
Entry field with incorrect answer
276000
Entry field with incorrect answer
206800
Totals $Entry field with incorrect answer
411200
$Entry field with incorrect answer
834000
$Entry field with incorrect answer
444800

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Business

question
Business, 22.06.2019 07:50
In december of 2004, the company you own entered into a 20-year contract with a grain supplier for daily deliveries of grain to its hot dog bun manufacturing facility. the contract called for "10,000 pounds of grain" to be delivered to the facility at the price of $100,000 per day. until february 2017, the supplier provided processed grain which could easily be used in your manufacturing process. however, no longer wanting to absorb the cost of having the grain processed, the supplier began delivering whole grain. the supplier is arguing that the contract does not specify the type of grain that would be supplied and that it has not breached the contract. your company is arguing that the supplier has an onsite processing plant and processed grain was implicit to the terms of the contract. over the remaining term of the contract, reshipping and having the grain processed would cost your company approximately $10,000,000, opposed to a cost of around $1,000,000 to the supplier. after speaking with in-house counsel, it was estimated that litigation would cost the company several million dollars and last for years. weighing the costs of litigation, along with possible ambiguity in the contract, what are three options you could take to resolve the dispute? which would be the best option for your business and why?
Answers: 2
question
Business, 22.06.2019 12:40
Evan company reports net income of $232,000 each year and declares an annual cash dividend of $100,000. the company holds net assets of $2,130,000 on january 1, 2017. on that date, shalina purchases 40 percent of evan's outstanding common stock for $1,066,000, which gives it the ability to significantly influence evan. at the purchase date, the excess of shalina’s cost over its proportionate share of evan’s book value was assigned to goodwill. on december 31, 2019, what is the investment in evan company balance (equity method) in shalina’s financial records?
Answers: 2
question
Business, 22.06.2019 20:30
Almeda products, inc., uses a job-order costing system. the company's inventory balances on april 1, the start of its fiscal year, were as follows:
Answers: 2
question
Business, 22.06.2019 23:00
Doogan corporation makes a product with the following standard costs: standard quantity or hours standard price or rate direct materials 2.0 grams $ 7.00 per gram direct labor 1.6 hours $ 12.00 per hour variable overhead 1.6 hours $ 6.00 per hour the company produced 5,000 units in january using 10,340 grams of direct material and 2,320 direct labor-hours. during the month, the company purchased 10,910 grams of the direct material at $7.30 per gram. the actual direct labor rate was $12.85 per hour and the actual variable overhead rate was $5.80 per hour. the company applies variable overhead on the basis of direct labor-hours. the direct materials purchases variance is computed when the materials are purchased. the materials quantity variance for january is:
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Monty Industrial Products Inc. is a diversified industrial-cleaner processing company. The company’s...
Questions
question
Arts, 31.05.2021 21:50
question
Mathematics, 31.05.2021 21:50
question
Mathematics, 31.05.2021 21:50
Questions on the website: 13722363