subject
Business, 20.03.2020 09:58 semajac11135

The Whereami County government has cut its spending by $4.5 million and raised taxes on County residents by $3.5 million in order to close a growing budget deficit. If the local marginal propensity to consume is 0.9, by how much has local GDP decreased because of these changes to government spending and taxes?

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Business

question
Business, 22.06.2019 14:20
Jaynet spends $50,000 per year on painting supplies and storage space. she recently received two job offers from a famous marketing firm – one offer was for $95,000 per year, and the other was for $120,000. however, she turned both jobs down to continue a painting career. if jaynet sells 35 paintings per year at a price of $6,000 each: a. what are her accounting profits? b. what are her economic profits?
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 17:30
What is one counter argument to the premise that the wealth gap is a serious problem which needs to be addressed?
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 23:30
Miller company’s most recent contribution format income statement is shown below: total per unit sales (20,000 units) $300,000 $15.00 variable expenses 180,000 9.00 contribution margin 120,000 $6.00 fixed expenses 70,000 net operating income $ 50,000 required: prepare a new contribution format income statement under each of the following conditions (consider each case independently): (do not round intermediate calculations. round your "per unit" answers to 2 decimal places.) 1. the number of units sold increases by 15%.
Answers: 1
question
Business, 23.06.2019 15:00
How should the environmental effects be dealt with when evaluating this project? the environmental effects should be ignored since the plant is legal without mitigation. the environmental effects should be treated as a sunk cost and therefore ignored. if the utility mitigates for the environmental effects, the project is not acceptable. however, before the company chooses to do the project without mitigation, it needs to make sure that any costs of "ill will" for not mitigating for the environmental effects have been considered in the original analysis. the environmental effects should be treated as a remote possibility and should only be considered at the time in which they actually occur. the environmental effects if not mitigated would result in additional cash flows. therefore, since the plant is legal without mitigation, there are no benefits to performing a "no mitigation" analysis.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
The Whereami County government has cut its spending by $4.5 million and raised taxes on County resid...
Questions
question
English, 23.05.2021 18:30
question
Social Studies, 23.05.2021 18:30
question
Mathematics, 23.05.2021 18:30
question
Biology, 23.05.2021 18:30
Questions on the website: 13722361