Suppose the U. S. imports wool from low-cost producer New Zealand. If the U. S. signed a regional trade agreement with Britain (assume Britain produces wool at a higher cost than New Zealand) that lowers tariffs on British wool, it is possible that the U. S. might switch to importing wool from Britain. Such an outcome illustrates the potential for regional trade agreements to A. bring about "Trade Creation" which is beneficial to the world economy. B. bring about "Trade Diversion" which is harmful to the world economy. C. bring about no differences in "Trade Creation" and "Trade Diversion". D. bring about "Trade Diversion" and "Trade Creation" at the same time, and hence not really matter in this case.

Plz i have no idea what a cover letter is can u guys explain it to me write a letter to the address below. you are responding to an advertisement from the willamette company for a job opening as an office assistant. you did some research and learned that the person to whom the application should be sent is ms. katrina n. d. waives. you are going to enclose a résumé and three letters of reference. your résumé will have details about your qualifications, so you should just give a brief but inviting overview of them here. in addition, your letter will include a very important paragraph that is not normally a part of a business letter. you will tell what format you are using for your letter where you got the information on this format. address of the willamette company: 355 buck hill road, portland, oregon 48792.

Stella company sells only two products, product a and product b. product a product b total selling price $50 $30 variable cost per unit $20 $10 total fixed costs $2,110,000 stella sells two units of product a for each unit it sells of product b. stella faces a tax rate of 40%. stella desires a net afterminustax income of $54,000. the breakeven point in units would be

David paid $975,000 for two beachfront lots in coastal south carolina, with the intention of building residential homes on each. two years later, the south carolina legislature passed the beachfront management act, barring any further development of the coast, including david's lots. when david files a complaint to seek compensation for his property, south carolina refuses, pointing to a passage in david's own complaint that states "the beachfront management act [was] properly and validly designed to south carolina's " is south carolina required to compensate david under the takings clause?