subject
Business, 24.03.2020 05:33 christinapim

Webster and Moore paid $148,000, in cash, for equipment three years ago. At the beginning of last year, the company spent $21,000 to update the equipment with the latest technology. The company no longer uses this equipment in its current operations and has received an offer of $96,000 from a firm that would like to purchase it. The firm is debating whether to sell the equipment or to expand its operations so that the equipment can be used. The equipment, including the updates, has a book value of $44,500. When evaluating the expansion option, what value, if any, should the firm assign to this equipment as an initial cost of the project?

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Business

question
Business, 22.06.2019 18:30
You should typically prepare at least questions for the people who will host you during a job shadow. a. 3 b. 4 c. 5 d. 2
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 20:10
As the inventor of hypertension medication, onesure pharmaceuticals (osp) inc. was able to reap the benefits of economies of scale due to a large consumer demand for the drug. even when competitors later developed similar drugs after the expiry of osp's patents, regular users did not want to switch because they were concerned about possible side effects. which of the following benefits does this scenario best illustrate? a. first-mover advantages b. social benefits c. network externalities d. fringe benefits
Answers: 3
question
Business, 23.06.2019 01:50
The capital balances, prior to the liquidation of the benjamin, gaynor, megan partnership, were as follows: benjamin, capital $100,000gaynor, capital $120,000megan, capital $175,000benjamin, gaynor, and megan share profits and losses in the ratio of 25%, 40%, 35%. as a result of a loan, the partnership owes gaynor $80,000. using the information above, which partner has the highest loss absorption power (lap) prior to liquidation? a. gaynorb. meganc. benjamind. both gaynor and megan have the same lap
Answers: 2
question
Business, 23.06.2019 09:30
Clara client has just been presented with a standard representation agreement by the law firm of yatz & berger. clara's first language is german. although she speaks and reads everyday english quite well, the legal terms in the contract confuse her. yatz & berger should question 90 options: have someone in the firm, if possible, or a translator from outside of the firm, explain the terms of the contract thoroughly until clara has a full and complete understanding of its terms. advise clara to take the contract home and study it before signing it. have a paralegal explain the most important clauses in the contract to clara in smaller, plain english words. advise clara to sign the contract and take her copy home for study.
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
Webster and Moore paid $148,000, in cash, for equipment three years ago. At the beginning of last ye...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 14.07.2019 06:30
Questions on the website: 13722363