subject
Business, 26.03.2020 20:08 22justinmcminn

Consider This) Susie purchased a nonrefundable ticket to a soccer match for $20. It will cost her $10 worth of gas and wear and tear to drive to the match and $5 to park her car. On the day of the match, Susie's boss offers her $100 to come to work instead. In considering what to do, which of the above would be considered a sunk cost? Multiple Choice The $20 ticket to the match. The $10 cost to drive to the match. The $5 cost to park at the stadium. The $100 offered by Susie's boss.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Business

question
Business, 21.06.2019 18:20
Elon musk is the ceo of tesla motors. musk also serves as chairman of tesla's board. according to corporate governance theory, which of the following is a logical reason why musk should serve on the board? 1. he serves on many other boards, including that of a major client of tesla.2. his is an independent director who is well positioned to monitor the company's management.3. he can easily fire board members that are shirking their duties.4. he can provide the board with valuable inside information about the firm and the industry.
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 11:30
Buyer henry is going to accept seller shannon's $282,500 counteroffer. when will this counteroffer become a contract. a. counteroffers cannot become contracts b. when henry gives shannon notice of the acceptance c. when henry signs the counteroffer d. when shannon first made the counteroffer
Answers: 3
question
Business, 22.06.2019 17:30
The purchasing agent for a company that assembles and sells air-conditioning equipment in a latin american country noted that the cost of compressors has increased significantly each time they have been reordered. the company uses an eoq model to determine order size. what are the implications of this price escalation with respect to order size? what factors other than price must be taken into consideration?
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 19:00
Which of the following is likely not a benefit of requiring a grand jury to listen to and examine all of the evidence against a person suspected of committing a serious crime and then independently deciding whether or not to hand down an indictment? 1.the grand jury system provides the accused another safeguard against being sent to trial and facing conviction based on flawed evidence. 2.the members of the grand jury are drawn from the community and are empowered to render independent decisions about whether or not the government has collected enough evidence to bring an individual to trial. 3.the grand jury’s decision can provide prosecutors insight into what is necessary to build a sufficient case if a similar crime is presented later. 4.the grand jury is impaneled to rubber-stamp prosecutors’ cases, which makes it possible for more cases to reach trial.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Consider This) Susie purchased a nonrefundable ticket to a soccer match for $20. It will cost her $1...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 05.12.2019 02:31
question
Mathematics, 05.12.2019 02:31
Questions on the website: 13722362