Wallmart is accused of predatory pricing by Doormart. Wallmart could defend itself against this accusation. Which of the following would not be one of their arguments? Group of answer choices Wallmart believes that raising prices once Doortmart leaves the industry is a poor business decision. Doormart signed an agreement with Wallmart allowing both firms to engage in predatory pricing. The courts have no simple rule that helps to determine when Wallmart has stepped over the line. The decisions by Wallmart can look and feel like spirited competition.

The correct answer is B) Doormart signed an agreement with Wallmart allowing both firms to engage in predatory pricing.

Wallmart is accused of predatory pricing by Doormart. Wallmart could defend itself against this accusation. The option that would not be one of their arguments would be "Doormart signed an agreement with Wallmart allowing both firms to engage in predatory pricing."

This option would be inconceivable because laws and regulations prohibit companies to sign an agreement that could be against the benefits of the American consumer. A situation like that could seem like an agreement "behind doors" that also hampers or hurts other competitors in the industry. Predatory pricing is an illegal practice aimed at eliminating other competitors in the market by setting very low prices. Something like this could create monopolies.

um sure