Business, 31.03.2020 03:59 wehack523

The accompanying payoff matrix presents the profits for Firm A and Firm B under two pricing strategies. Firm A's strategy High price Low price Firm B's strategy High price Firm A Profit = $ 87 $87 Firm B Profit = $ 87 $87 Firm A Profit = $ 105 $105 Firm B Profit = $ 49 $49 Low price Firm A Profit = $ 49 $49 Firm B Profit = $ 105 $105 Firm A Profit = $ 71 $71 Firm B Profit = $ 71 $71 Suppose both firms have agreed to employ strategies that maximize their combined profits. How will the firms act? Firm A will Set a high price Set a low price Firm B will Set a high price Set a low price Compare the profits of Firm A when both firms respect the collusive agreement to the profits of Firm A when Firm A secretly cheats on the agreement. How much additional profit would Firm A earn by secretly cheating on the agreement to collude? Round your answer to the nearest whole number. Firm A's additional profit when cheating: $ Compare the profits of Firm A when both firms respect the collusive agreement to the profits of Firm A when both firms cheat on the agreement. By how much would the profit of Firm A fall if both firms cheat on the agreement to collude? Round your answer to the nearest whole number. Firm A's lost profits when both cheat: $

Answers: 3

Show answers

Another question on Business

Business, 22.06.2019 07:50

In december of 2004, the company you own entered into a 20-year contract with a grain supplier for daily deliveries of grain to its hot dog bun manufacturing facility. the contract called for "10,000 pounds of grain" to be delivered to the facility at the price of $100,000 per day. until february 2017, the supplier provided processed grain which could easily be used in your manufacturing process. however, no longer wanting to absorb the cost of having the grain processed, the supplier began delivering whole grain. the supplier is arguing that the contract does not specify the type of grain that would be supplied and that it has not breached the contract. your company is arguing that the supplier has an onsite processing plant and processed grain was implicit to the terms of the contract. over the remaining term of the contract, reshipping and having the grain processed would cost your company approximately $10,000,000, opposed to a cost of around $1,000,000 to the supplier. after speaking with in-house counsel, it was estimated that litigation would cost the company several million dollars and last for years. weighing the costs of litigation, along with possible ambiguity in the contract, what are three options you could take to resolve the dispute? which would be the best option for your business and why?

Answers: 2

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 10:40

You were able to purchase two tickets to an upcoming concert for $100 apiece when the concert was first announced three months ago. recently, you saw that stubhub was listing similar seats for $225 apiece. what does it cost you to attend the concert?

Answers: 1

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 13:00

Reliability and validity reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. in the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways. unfortunately, being consistent in measurement does not necessarily mean that you have measured something correctly. to illustrate this concept, consider a kitchen scale that would be used to measure the weight of cereal that you eat in the morning. if the scale is not properly calibrated, it may consistently under- or overestimate the amount of cereal that’s being measured. while the scale is highly reliable in producing consistent results (e.g., the same amount of cereal poured onto the scale produces the same reading each time), those results are incorrect. this is where validity comes into play. validity refers to the extent to which a given instrument or tool accurately measures what it’s supposed to measure. while any valid measure is by necessity reliable, the reverse is not necessarily true. researchers strive to use instruments that are both highly reliable and valid.

Answers: 1

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 13:50

Selected t-account balances for bloomfield company are shown below as of january 31, which reflect its accounting adjustments. the firm uses a calendar-year accounting period, but prepares monthly accounting adjustments.suppliesjan. 31 bal. 1,800 1,800 jan. 31 bal.supplies expensejan. 31 bal. 1,920 1,148 jan. 31 bal.prepaid insurancejan. 31 bal. 1,148 1,148 jan. 31 bal.insurance expensejan. 31 bal. 164 164 jan. 31 bal.wages payablejan. 31 bal. 1,400 1,400 jan. 31 bal.wages expensejan. 31 bal. 6,400 6,400 jan. 31 bal.truckjan. 31 bal. 17,376 17,376 jan. 31 bal.accumulated depreciation -truckjan. 31 bal. 5,068 5,068 jan. 31 bal.a. if the amount in supplies expense represents the january 31 adjustment for the supplies used in january, and $1,240 worth of supplies were purchased during january, what was the january 1 beginning balance of supplies? $answerb. the amount in the insurance expense account represents the adjustment made at january 31 for january insurance expense. if the original insurance premium was for one year, what was the amount of the premium, and on what date did the insurance policy start? amount of the premium $answerthe policy began on answerjune 1july 1august 1september 1october 1november 1 of the previous year.c. if we assume that no beginning balance existed in either in either wage payable or wage expense on january 1, how much cash was paid as wages during january? $answerd. if the truck has a useful life of four years (or 48 months), what is the monthly amount of depreciation expense, and how many months has bloomfield owned the truck? answermonths

Answers: 1

Answer

You know the right answer?

The accompanying payoff matrix presents the profits for Firm A and Firm B under two pricing strategi...

Questions