A business consultant suggested that Doug’s Dens build a master schedule at the subassembly level (i. e., for the floor, roof, and frame assemblies) rather than at the finished product level (i. e., Fido’s Favorite and Charlie’s Castle). The consultant said that this is the approach used by Dell (Doug idolizes Michael Dell as a role model). Discuss whether this approach makes sense and explain why or why not.

The adviser approached Doug lairs to go for mass customization technique as this has profited DELL in PC market. Doug is in giving total answer for floor, rooftop and Frame congregations. The mass customization approach make sense in this area. Today a client need to choose each and everything on its own one can't drive them to purchase an item which organization believes is useful.  

This methodology will open alternatives for clients as they don't need to purchase the completed items and they can make their own items with shading and plan determination. In the event that an individual isn't content with certain shade of divider he can change the shading which suits his taste. There are enormous choices for ground surface items so we can without much of a stretch give an individual access to various looks of floor tiles. This will change over a client into plan master and the client will be progressively fulfilled as he has chosen himself all the structures.

oof

explanation:

f