The following selected transactions were completed during August between Summit Co. and Beartooth Co.: Aug. 1 Summit Co. sold merchandise on account to Beartooth Co., $48,300, terms FOB destination, 2/15, n/eom. The cost of the merchandise sold was $29,960. 2 Summit Co. paid freight of $1,230 for delivery of merchandise sold to Beartooth Co. on August 1. 5 Summit Co. sold merchandise on account to Beartooth Co., $70,210, terms FOB shipping point, n/eom. The cost of the merchandise sold was $38,490. 9 Beartooth Co. paid freight of $2,450 on August 5 purchase from Summit Company. 15 Summit Co. sold merchandise on account to Beartooth Co., $55,200, terms FOB shipping point, 1/10, n/30. Summit Company paid freight of $1,795, which was added to the invoice. The cost of the merchandise sold was $33,780. 16 Beartooth Co. paid Summit Company for purchase of August 1. 20 Summit Company paid Beartooth Co. a refund of $1,800 for defective merchandise in the August 1 purchase. Beartooth Co. agreed to keep the merchandise. 25 Beartooth Co. paid Summit Company on account for purchase of August 15. 31 Summit Company granted a customer allowance (credit memo) to Beartooth Co. for $6,000 (invoiced amount) for merchandise that was returned from the August 1 purchase. The cost of the merchandise returned was $3,200.

Personal financial planning is the process of creating and achieving financial goals? true or false

In december of 2004, the company you own entered into a 20-year contract with a grain supplier for daily deliveries of grain to its hot dog bun manufacturing facility. the contract called for "10,000 pounds of grain" to be delivered to the facility at the price of $100,000 per day. until february 2017, the supplier provided processed grain which could easily be used in your manufacturing process. however, no longer wanting to absorb the cost of having the grain processed, the supplier began delivering whole grain. the supplier is arguing that the contract does not specify the type of grain that would be supplied and that it has not breached the contract. your company is arguing that the supplier has an onsite processing plant and processed grain was implicit to the terms of the contract. over the remaining term of the contract, reshipping and having the grain processed would cost your company approximately $10,000,000, opposed to a cost of around $1,000,000 to the supplier. after speaking with in-house counsel, it was estimated that litigation would cost the company several million dollars and last for years. weighing the costs of litigation, along with possible ambiguity in the contract, what are three options you could take to resolve the dispute? which would be the best option for your business and why?

David consumes two things: gasoline (g) and bread (b). david's utility function is u(g, b) = 10g^0.25 b^0.75. use the lagrange technique to solve for david's optimal choices of gasoline and bread as a function of the price of gasoline, p_g, the price of bread, p_b, and his income m. with recent decrease in the price of gasoline (maybe due to external shock such as shale gas production) does david increase his consumption of gasoline? for david, how does partial differential g/partial differential p_g depend on his income m? that is, how does david's change in gasoline consumption due to an increase in the price of gasoline depend on his income level? to answer these questions, find the cross-partial derivative, |partial differential^2 g/partial differential m partial differential p_g.