subject
Business, 05.05.2020 20:20 dayanara72

Understanding Herzberg's Motivating Factors Theory In 1960, Frederick Herzberg constructed a two-dimensional paradigm of factors that affect people's work attitudes According to Herzberg's theory, motivators are job factors that cause employees to be productive and that give them satisfaction. Conversely, hygiene factors (or maintenance factors) are factors that can cause dissatisfaction if they are , missing but they do not necessarily motivate employees if they are increased Herzberg's study asked workers to rank various job-related factors in order of importance relative to motivation. The question was, "what creates enthusiasm for workers and makes them work to their full potential?" Fourteen factors were identified. Factors receiving the most votes all clustered around job content. Herzberg also found that workers did not consider factors related to the job environment to be motivators; in particular, pay was not a factor. Workers felt that the absence of good pay, job security, and friendly supervisors could cause dissatisfaction, but their presence did not motivate employees to work harder, they just provided satisfaction and contentment in the work situation. Herzberg concluded that certain factors, which he called motivators, made employees productive and gave them satisfaction. Herzberg called other elements of the job hygiene factors (or maintenance factors). These related to the job environment and could cause dissatisfaction if missing but would not necessarily motivate employees if increased Read the description on each box, and then drag that box to the column you feel is correct ce of ibility Motivators and rules ay work itself Job security Reset

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Business

question
Business, 21.06.2019 21:00
Identifying transactions national park tours co. is a travel agency. the nine transactions recorded by national park tours during may 2019, its first month of operations, are indicated in the following t accounts: cash (1) 75,000 (2) 900 (7) 8,150 (3) 1,600 (4) 6,280 (6) 2,700 (9) 2,500 accounts receivable (5) 12,300 (7) 8,150 supplies (2) 900 (8) 660 equipment (3) 8,000 accounts payable (6) 2,700 (3) 6,400 beth worley, capital (1) 75,000 beth worley, drawing (9) 2,500 fees earned (5) 12,300 operating expenses (4) 6,280 (8) 660 indicate for each debit and each credit (a) whether an asset, liability, owner's equity, drawing, revenue, or expense account was affected and (b) whether the account was increased (+) or decreased account debited account credited transaction type effect type effect (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9)
Answers: 3
question
Business, 21.06.2019 21:30
The following balance sheet for the los gatos corporation was prepared by a recently hired accountant. in reviewing the statement you notice several errors. los gatos corporation balance sheet at december 31, 2018 assets cash $ 44,000 accounts receivable 86,000 inventories 57,000 machinery (net) 122,000 franchise (net) 32,000 total assets $ 341,000 liabilities and shareholders' equity accounts payable $ 54,000 allowance for uncollectible accounts 7,000 note payable 59,000 bonds payable 112,000 shareholders' equity 109,000 total liabilities and shareholders' equity $ 341,000 additional information: cash includes a $22,000 restricted amount to be used for repayment of the bonds payable in 2022. the cost of the machinery is $194,000. accounts receivable includes a $22,000 note receivable from a customer due in 2021. the note payable includes accrued interest of $7,000. principal and interest are both due on february 1, 2019. the company began operations in 2013. income less dividends since inception of the company totals $37,000. 52,000 shares of no par common stock were issued in 2013. 200,000 shares are authorized. required: prepare a corrected, classified balance sheet. (amounts to be deducted should be indicated by a minus sign.)
Answers: 2
question
Business, 22.06.2019 06:50
Suppose the marginal damage and marginal benefit curves in a polluted neighborhood are md = p/3 and mb = 4 – p. also, suppose that transactions costs are low, so that the consumers and the firm can bargain. we saw that in this case, the socially-optimal level of pollution is achieved. start by computing the socially-optimal p. then, for each of the following cases, compute the amount of money transferred through the bargaining process, and indicate who pays whom (i.e., whether consumers pay the firm, or vice versa). also, compute the gains to each party relative to the status quo (i.e., the starting point of the bargaining process).a)consumers have the right to clean air; firm is dominant in the bargaining process.b)consumers have the right to clean air; consumers are dominant in the bargaining process.c)firm has the right to pollute; firm is dominant in the bargaining process.d)firm has the right to pollute; consumers are dominant in the bargaining proces
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 11:10
Suppose that the firm cherryblossom has an orchard they are willing to sell today. the net annual returns to the orchard are expected to be $50,000 per year for the next 20 years. at the end of 20 years, it is expected the land will sell for $30,000. calculate the market value of the orchard if the market rate of return on comparable investments is 16%.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Understanding Herzberg's Motivating Factors Theory In 1960, Frederick Herzberg constructed a two-dim...
Questions
Questions on the website: 13722367