Project S has a pattern of high cash flows in its early life, while Project L has a longer life, with large cash flows late in its life. Neither has negative cash flows after Year 0, and at the current cost of capital, the two projects have identical NPVs. Now suppose interest rates and money costs decline. Other things held constant, this change will cause L to become preferred to S.

The Statement is True.

Explanation:

From what was given, and keeping

Other things held constant, if the cost of capital decrease, there will be an increase in the net present value of Project L because Project L has longer life and with large cash flow at late in life. It will be discounted at lower discount rate which results in more present value of cash flow while Project S cash flows are occurring in early years will be discounted at higher discount rate and advantage of low cost discounting would not be availed, this is the reason NPV of project L will increase in comparison to that of Project S.

idk

explanation:

bc why nah

being born in poverty would limit the people's chances, opportunities and benefits.

this happen because of several things, such as:

- poor people tend to gain less access to good education and nutrition. this mean that their chance to obtain high paying jobs would also be limited.

- poor people tend to socialize with other poor people while the rich tend to socialize with other rich people. this means that simply throguh their social circle, rich people would have more business opportunities compared to the poor people.

- rich people tend to have more capital in their disposal. this would benefit them in business since it is far easier for them to fund their business operation compared to poor people.