RequiredIndicate the effect of each of the following transactions on (1) the current ratio, (2) working capital, (3) stockholders’ equity, (4) book value per share of common stock, and (5) retained earnings. Assume that the current ratio is greater than 1:1. (Indicate the effect of each transactions by selecting "+" for increase, "–" for decrease, and "NC" for no change.)a. Collected account receivable. b.Wrote off account receivable. c.Converted a short-term note payable to a long-term payable. d.Purchased inventory on account. e.Declared cash dividend. f.Sold merchandise on account at a profit. g.Issued stock dividend. h.Paid account payable. i. Sold building at a lossdo a +, -. or NC for each one. Current Ratioa. b.c. d.e. f.g. h.i. Working Capitala. b.c. d.e. f.g. h.i. Stockholders Equitya. b.c. d.e. f.g. h.i. Book Valuea. b.c. d.e. f.g. h.i. Retained Earningsa. b.c. d.e. f.g. h.i.

Cooper sues company a in state court in south carolina, where he lives, for negligence alleging personal injury and property damage of $100,000 after a truck driven by an employee of company a rear-ended his pickup truck. company a is incorporated in delaware, has its headquarters in new york, but does a substantial amount of business in south carolina. claiming diversity of citizenship, company a seeks removal to federal district court, but cooper opposes the motion. which of the following is true regarding whether the case may be properly removed to federal district court? the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and if company a's nerve center is in a state other than south carolina, then the case may be properly removed to federal court.the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and because company a is incorporated and has its headquarters in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is incorporated in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a's headquarters, nerve center, or principal place of business is located.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is headquartered in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a is incorporated and regardless of the location of its nerve center.because the amount in controversy fails to satisfy jurisdictional requirements, regardless of the location of company a, the case may not be removed to federal court.