Larry owns a store that sells a variety of men's accessories, including shoes, wallets, briefcases, and belts. While shopping in Larry's store, Ed placed his wallet on a shelf so he could look at a particular pair of shoes. When Ed walked away, he forgot to pick up the wallet and left the store without it. Another customer, Susan, noticed the wallet on the shelf a few minutes later. She hadn't seen Ed leave it there, and brought the wallet to Larry at the front counter. Larry thanked her and set the wallet aside, meaning to put it in the back office for safekeeping. However, before he could secure the wallet, Larry was distracted by a phone call. Another customer, Scott, saw the wallet on the counter, took it, and left the store. Once outside, Larry opened the wallet and looked through it. When Larry realized that the wallet contained nothing but two dollars and an expired library card, he tossed the wallet on the ground in disgust and walked away. Five minutes later, Olivia, a passerby, noticed the wallet on the ground. She decided to keep it for herself, so she picked up the wallet and took it home.-Which of the following is the most accurate classification of the wallet in the above scenario?A) Mislaid propertyB) Abandoned propertyC) Missing propertyD) Lost propertyE) Stolen property

According to the u.s. census bureau (), the median household income in the united states was $23,618 in 1985, $34,076 in 1995, $46,326 in 2005, and $57,230 in 2015. in purchasing power terms, how did family income compare in each of those four years? you will need to know that the cpi (multiplied by 100, 1982–1984 = 100) was 107.6 in 1985, 152.4 in 1995, 195.3 in 2005, and 237.0 in 2015

Acrosswalk_when there are no pavement markings.

In december of 2004, the company you own entered into a 20-year contract with a grain supplier for daily deliveries of grain to its hot dog bun manufacturing facility. the contract called for "10,000 pounds of grain" to be delivered to the facility at the price of $100,000 per day. until february 2017, the supplier provided processed grain which could easily be used in your manufacturing process. however, no longer wanting to absorb the cost of having the grain processed, the supplier began delivering whole grain. the supplier is arguing that the contract does not specify the type of grain that would be supplied and that it has not breached the contract. your company is arguing that the supplier has an onsite processing plant and processed grain was implicit to the terms of the contract. over the remaining term of the contract, reshipping and having the grain processed would cost your company approximately $10,000,000, opposed to a cost of around $1,000,000 to the supplier. after speaking with in-house counsel, it was estimated that litigation would cost the company several million dollars and last for years. weighing the costs of litigation, along with possible ambiguity in the contract, what are three options you could take to resolve the dispute? which would be the best option for your business and why?