A television station aired a broadcast containing insulting remarks about a local official. The official had the broadcaster arrested and charged under a state statute that prohibited making defamatory statements on public officials. The broadcaster argued that the statute was in conflict with the U. S. Constitution's guaranty of free speech. The public official countered that the statute was legal and enforceable. Requried:
a. Can states enact laws that limit free speech?
b. If so, in what situations would they be allowed to do so?
c. Can a state statute be in conflict with the U. S. Constitution?
d. Does the official have a case for slander, libel, and or defamation of character? Why or why not on each count?

Side bar toggle icon performance in last 10 qs hard easy performance in last 10 questions - there are '3' correct answers, '3' wrong answers, '0' skipped answers, '1' partially correct answers about this question question difficulty difficulty 60% 42.2% students got it correct study this topic • demonstrate an understanding of sampling distributions question number q 3.8: choose the correct estimate for the standard error using the 95% rule.

Cooper sues company a in state court in south carolina, where he lives, for negligence alleging personal injury and property damage of $100,000 after a truck driven by an employee of company a rear-ended his pickup truck. company a is incorporated in delaware, has its headquarters in new york, but does a substantial amount of business in south carolina. claiming diversity of citizenship, company a seeks removal to federal district court, but cooper opposes the motion. which of the following is true regarding whether the case may be properly removed to federal district court? the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and if company a's nerve center is in a state other than south carolina, then the case may be properly removed to federal court.the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and because company a is incorporated and has its headquarters in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is incorporated in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a's headquarters, nerve center, or principal place of business is located.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is headquartered in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a is incorporated and regardless of the location of its nerve center.because the amount in controversy fails to satisfy jurisdictional requirements, regardless of the location of company a, the case may not be removed to federal court.

Asmall town wants to build some new recreational facilities. the proposed facilities include a swimming pool, recreation center, basketball court and baseball field. the town council wants to provide the facilities which will be used by the most people, but they face budget and land limitations. the town has $400,000 and 14 acres of land. the pool requires locker facilities which would be in the recreation center, so if the swimming pool is built the recreation center must also be built. also, the council has only enough flat land to build the basketball court or the baseball field. the daily usage and cost of the facilities (in $1,000) are shown below. which facilities should they build? facilityusagecost ($1,000)landswimming pool4001002recreation center5002003basketball court3001504baseball field2001005