subject
Business, 26.06.2020 16:01 xxhighwolfxx7508

A company incurred the following costs associated with the purchase of a piece of land that it will use to re-build an office building: Purchase price of the land $ 560,000 Sale of salvaged parts already on land $ 25,000 Demolition of the old building $ 20,000 Ground-breaking ceremony (food and supplies) $ 2,800 Land preparation and leveling $ 8,000 What amount should be recorded for the purchase of the land

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Business

question
Business, 22.06.2019 07:40
Myflvs -question 3 multiple choice worth 2 points)(10.04 hc)in panama city in january, high tide was at midnight. the water level at high tide was 9 feet and1 foot at low tide. assuming the next high tide is exactly 12 hours later and that the height of thewater can be modeled by a cosine curve, find an equation for water level in january for panamacity as a function of time (t).of(t) = 4 + 5of(t) = 5 cost + 4o 460) = 5 cos 1+ 4of(0) = 4 cos + 5
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 16:00
Analyzing and computing accrued warranty liability and expense waymire company sells a motor that carries a 60-day unconditional warranty against product failure. from prior years' experience, waymire estimates that 2% of units sold each period will require repair at an average cost of $100 per unit. during the current period, waymire sold 69,000 units and repaired 1,000 units. (a) how much warranty expense must waymire report in its current period income statement? (b) what warranty liability related to current period sales will waymire report on its current period-end balance sheet? (hint: remember that some units were repaired in the current period.) (c) what analysis issues must we consider with respect to reported warranty liabilities?
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 17:00
Cooper sues company a in state court in south carolina, where he lives, for negligence alleging personal injury and property damage of $100,000 after a truck driven by an employee of company a rear-ended his pickup truck. company a is incorporated in delaware, has its headquarters in new york, but does a substantial amount of business in south carolina. claiming diversity of citizenship, company a seeks removal to federal district court, but cooper opposes the motion. which of the following is true regarding whether the case may be properly removed to federal district court? the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and if company a's nerve center is in a state other than south carolina, then the case may be properly removed to federal court.the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and because company a is incorporated and has its headquarters in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is incorporated in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a's headquarters, nerve center, or principal place of business is located.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is headquartered in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a is incorporated and regardless of the location of its nerve center.because the amount in controversy fails to satisfy jurisdictional requirements, regardless of the location of company a, the case may not be removed to federal court.
Answers: 1
question
Business, 23.06.2019 17:00
Two firms, a and b, each currently emit 100 tons of chemicals into the air. the government has decided to reduce the pollution and from now on will require a pollution permit for each ton of pollution emitted into the air. the government gives each firm 40 pollution permits, which it can either use or sell to the other firm. it costs firm a $200 for each ton of pollution that it eliminates before it is emitted into the air, and it costs firm b $100 for each ton of pollution that it eliminates before it is emitted into the air. after the two firms buy or sell pollution permits from each other, we would expect that firm a will emit a. 100 fewer tons of pollution into the air, and firm b will emit 20 fewer tons of pollution into the air. b. 20 more tons of pollution into the air, and firm b will emit 100 fewer tons of pollution into the air. c. 50 fewer tons of pollution into the air, and firm b will emit 50 fewer tons of pollution into the air. d. 20 fewer tons of pollution into the air, and firm b will emit 100 fewer tons of pollution into the air.
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
A company incurred the following costs associated with the purchase of a piece of land that it will...
Questions
question
Social Studies, 16.10.2019 07:00
question
History, 16.10.2019 07:00
question
World Languages, 16.10.2019 07:00
question
Mathematics, 16.10.2019 07:00
question
Social Studies, 16.10.2019 07:00
Questions on the website: 13722367