You and a classmate are assigned a project on which you will receive one combined grade. You each want to receive a good grade, but you also want to avoid hard work. In particular, here is the situation: • If both of you work hard, you both get an A, which gives each of you 50 units of happiness.
• If only one of you works hard, you both get a B, which gives each of you 40 units of happiness.
• If neither of you works hard, you both get a D, which gives each of you 15 units of happiness.
• Working hard costs 30 units of happiness.
Complete the following payoff matrix given the previous information. In each cell, your classmate's payoff is on the left and yours is on the right.
Your Decision
Work Shirk
Classmate's Decision Work , ,
Shirk , ,
The likely outcome is that your classmate and you . If you get this classmate as your partner on a series of projects throughout the year, rather than only once, you are likely to engage in cooperation. Another classmate cares more about good grades: He gets 60 units of happiness for a B and 95 units of happiness for an A.
Complete the following payoff matrix, assuming you have this classmate as a partner.
Your Decision
Work Shirk
Classmate's Decision Work , ,
Shirk , ,
The likely outcome in this case is that your classmate and you . You would prefer the classmate as a partner, and he want you as a partner.

This problem has been solved! see the answercompute and interpret altman's z-scoresfollowing is selected financial information for ebay, for its fiscal years 2005 and 2006.(in millions, except per share data) 2006 2005current assets $ 4,970.59 $ 3,183.24current liabilities 2,518.39 1,484.93total assets 13,494.01 11,788.99total liabilities 2,589.38 1,741.00shares outstanding 1,368.51 1,404.18retained earnings 4,538.35 2,819.64stock price per share 30.07 43.22sales 5,969.74 4,552.40earnings before interest and taxes 1,439.77 1,445.18compute and interpret altman z-scores for the company for both years. (do not round until your final answer; then round your answers to two decimal places.)2006 z-score = answer2005 z-score = answerwhich of the following best describes the company's likelihood to go bankrupt given the z-score in 2006 compared to 2007.the z-score in 2006 is half of the 2005 score. both z-scores are well above the score that represents a healthy company.the z-score in 2006 is double the 2005 score. the z-score has increased sharply, which suggests the company has greatly increased the risk of bankruptcy.the z-score in 2006 is half of the 2005 score. the z-score has decreased sharply, which suggests the company is in financial distress.the z-score in 2006 is double the 2005 score. the z-score has increased sharply, which suggests the company has greatly lowered the risk of bankruptcy.