If ZipCar engaged in all the activities discussed in the video, but then sold customer data to a third party in a contradiction of its privacy policy, the company would be considered Multiple Choice socially responsible but not ethical. neither socially responsible nor ethical. socially irresponsible but ethical. both socially responsible and ethical. acting within its rights as a business.

The correct option is: both socially responsible and ethical.

Explanation:

To begin with, the fact that the company sold customer data to a third party, even thought that it engaged in all the other activities as promised, it will make it to be both socially responsible and ethical and that is because in a court the judge will be in favour of the more weak party, that is the customer whose date was sold without his approval to a third party, and therefore that in social terms the company will be guilty. Also, that action will affect the company in terms of ethical because once that it is all known by the customers whose date was sold then they will start a campaign in order to destroy the company's ethical image by the public and that will cause a huge decrease in the sales.

being born in poverty would limit the people's chances, opportunities and benefits.

this happen because of several things, such as:

- poor people tend to gain less access to good education and nutrition. this mean that their chance to obtain high paying jobs would also be limited.

- poor people tend to socialize with other poor people while the rich tend to socialize with other rich people. this means that simply throguh their social circle, rich people would have more business opportunities compared to the poor people.

- rich people tend to have more capital in their disposal. this would benefit them in business since it is far easier for them to fund their business operation compared to poor people.