Company X, a company in Illinois, contracted via the internet with Windows Bright, a small window washing business in Missouri to purchase 4 cases of Shiny Lite window cleaning solution at $200 per case. Company X paid via the internet with a company credit card. The contract stated that the 4 cases of Shiny Lite would be shipped to Company X’s place of business in Illinois via UPS. Explain why the contract between X and Windows Bright is subject to the Statute of Frauds. Will the internet electronic contract between X and Windows Bright satisfy the "writing" requirements for the Statute of Frauds? If so, how and why? Support your conclusion by referring to the specific UCC rule that applies.

The X and Windows Light say depends on the fraud status of the UCC.

Explanation:

For principal inquiry:-

Any document required for purchasing of goods must be registered as a hard copy to be enforceable under the Fraud Law of UCC. Take that as it may, this provision has a special case in cases where a retail deal reaches $500, at that stage, these deals are similarly enforceable under the fraud law of the UCC. For that kind of case, however, there is still no written traditional understanding between X and Openings Light, the price of included material is $800, so the deal among them depends on the fraudulent status of the UCC.

To the subsequent investigation:-

As mentioned in the paragraph above, the deal between X and Windows Bright depends on the fraud status of the UCC. Under Ucc Fraud Law, the contact between X and Window Bright in the electronic structure should get the job done for this case. The conditions are unquestionably met in both interactions and X completed the iteration for the move. Window Bright has given consent to the forwarding of the delivery to the place of employment of the X. This common understanding will accomplish the mission and satisfy the writing criteria of fraud status.

answer; intellectual property protection;