LSM subcontracted with Henry Isaacs Home Remodeling and Repair (Isaacs) to perform the roofing work on the project. Isaacs in turn subcontracted with Hal Brewster Home Improvements (Brewster), to conduct the roofing work on Isaacs' behalf. When Brewster performed work on the roof, he "botched the job" and caused extensive leaking inside the house. LSM and Issacs attempted to correct the problems, but eventually abandoned the project, leaving Logan-Baldwin to hire others to complete the renovations. Logan-Baldwin sued LSM, Isaacs, and Baldwin for breach of contract. Isaacs sought to dismiss Logan-Baldwin's claim against it, arguing no privity of contract existed between themselves and Logan-Baldwin, and therefore Isaacs should not be liable for any damages. Required:
Does Logan-Baldwin have contract rights over Isaacs as an intended third-party beneficiary?

1. Because Henry Isaacs delegated its duty to repair the roof to Brewster, Henry Isaacs remains responsible for Brewster's failure to install the new roof on the residence properly.
a. True
b. False

2. Logan-Baldwin is entitled to compensatory damages (covering the cost of hiring other contractors to fix the roof) caused by the breach of contract by LSM and Henry Isaacs.
a. True
b. False

3. Logan-Baldwin qualified as a third party creditor beneficiary of the contract between LSM and Henry Isaacs and the contract between Henry Isaacs and Brewster, even if Logan-Baldwin is not named in those contracts.
a. True
b. False

4. Palisades Plaza is not entitled to damages for breach contract by LSM, Henry Isaacs, and Brewster unless Palisades Plaza has clean hands and has tendered performance under the contract.
a. True
b. False

5. If the agreement between Henry Isaacs and Brewster to install a new roof is a novation, Henry Isaacs is not liable for breach of contract for the failure to install the new roof properly.
a. True
b. False