Tina buys a cat and keeps it in her apartment, even though her apartment lease includes a clause that prohibits tenants from owning a pet. She does not remove the cat even after the landlord gives her a written reminder of the lease agreement and insists that she remove the pet from the apartment. Tina refuses, saying that the cat is very small and will cause no damage to the apartment. The landlord decides to remove Tina due to the breach of the lease agreement. The legal process to remove the tenant is known as

actual eviction.

Explanation:

Since in the question it is mentioned that the Tina who buys a cat but as per the agreement it is written that it prohibits tenants from owning a pet. But after so many warnings but she denied to remove the cat. This results to remove the tenant as it is a breach of the lease agreement

Therefore this scenario represents the actual eviction as it is physically forced to leave the apartment when the tenant ignored the warnings given by the landlord. In this, the landlord could also include the police

b.

c.

d.

g.

those r all of them i believe

answer; whoever is willing and able to pay the price;