1. Universal, Inc., a manufacturer of space suits, entered into a contract with the Taylor family, who owned the Vancouver Penguins, a minor league baseball team. Universal rented space in the center field electronic sign. The terms of the contract gave Universal the right to change the wording of the sign, and the ball club had two days to install the new sign. Initially, the sign indicated that Universal would pay $2,000 to any player who was able to steal two bases in one game. Two weeks after the sign was posted, Tony Anderson managed to steal two bases in one game. At the conclusion of the game, Universal requested that the sign be changed to indicate that $3,000 would be paid to any player who managed to hit a triple. A week later, the original sign was still in place. In the game that took place that day, Ben Miller stole two basis and Doug McKenzie hit a triple. Universal will not pay Anderson, Miller, and McKenzie. What rights do each player have

This problem has been solved! see the answercompute and interpret altman's z-scoresfollowing is selected financial information for ebay, for its fiscal years 2005 and 2006.(in millions, except per share data) 2006 2005current assets $ 4,970.59 $ 3,183.24current liabilities 2,518.39 1,484.93total assets 13,494.01 11,788.99total liabilities 2,589.38 1,741.00shares outstanding 1,368.51 1,404.18retained earnings 4,538.35 2,819.64stock price per share 30.07 43.22sales 5,969.74 4,552.40earnings before interest and taxes 1,439.77 1,445.18compute and interpret altman z-scores for the company for both years. (do not round until your final answer; then round your answers to two decimal places.)2006 z-score = answer2005 z-score = answerwhich of the following best describes the company's likelihood to go bankrupt given the z-score in 2006 compared to 2007.the z-score in 2006 is half of the 2005 score. both z-scores are well above the score that represents a healthy company.the z-score in 2006 is double the 2005 score. the z-score has increased sharply, which suggests the company has greatly increased the risk of bankruptcy.the z-score in 2006 is half of the 2005 score. the z-score has decreased sharply, which suggests the company is in financial distress.the z-score in 2006 is double the 2005 score. the z-score has increased sharply, which suggests the company has greatly lowered the risk of bankruptcy.