Scenario: Jane, age 16, buys a motorbike from Carl’s Cycle Shop for $400 in January 2015. She used it for a month and then signed a paper in February stating that she ratified the contract with Carl. Jane continues to use the bike for three more months before taking it back to Carl’s Cycle Shop in May claiming it was too slow and she just did not like riding anymore. Jane demanded the return of her $400, even though she had worn down the tires and tore the seat. According to the majority view, explain whether Jane can get her money back from Carl without accounting for the wear and tear on the motorbike? According to the modern view, explain what is likely to happen? Question Prompt: Within your answer, identify the rules of law associated with (a) a minor’s ability to enter into a contract, (b) a minor’s ability to disaffirm a contract, and (c) a minor’s obligations upon disaffirmance.