subject
Business, 05.11.2020 18:30 Demondevilg

Carlisle Company has been cited and must invest in equipment to reduce stack emissions or face EPA fines of $18,500 per year. An emission reduction filter will cost $75,000 and have an expected life of 5 years. Carlisle's MARR is 10%/yr. a. What is the internal rate of return of this investment?
b. What is the decision rule for judging the attractiveness of investments based on internal rate of return?
c. Is the filter economically justified?

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Business

question
Business, 21.06.2019 21:00
Which of the following is not a personality trait? sincerity word processing punctuality laziness
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 02:00
Kenney co. uses process costing to account for the production of canned energy drinks. direct materials are added at the beginning of the process and conversion costs are incurred uniformly throughout the process. equivalent units have been calculated to be 19,200 units for materials and 16,000 units for conversion costs. beginning inventory consisted of $11,200 in materials and $6,400 in conversion costs. april costs were $57,600 for materials and $64,000 for conversion costs. ending inventory still in process was 6,400 units (100% complete for materials, 50% for conversion). the total cost per unit using the weighted average method would be closest to:
Answers: 2
question
Business, 22.06.2019 09:30
Any point on a country's production possibilities frontier represents a combination of two goods that an economy:
Answers: 3
question
Business, 22.06.2019 10:40
What would happen to the equilibrium price and quantity of lattΓ©s if the cost to produce steamed milk
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Carlisle Company has been cited and must invest in equipment to reduce stack emissions or face EPA f...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 13.01.2021 18:00
question
Mathematics, 13.01.2021 18:00
question
Mathematics, 13.01.2021 18:00
question
Mathematics, 13.01.2021 18:00
Questions on the website: 13722367