Exclusive distributorships are: a. covered under the Robinson-Patman Act. b. illegal per se. c. questioned when there is no interbrand competition. d. all of the above

The correct option is c. EXCLUSIVE DISTRIBUTORSHIPS are questioned when there is no interbrand competition

Explanation:

The process in which a manufacturer of a goods or product decide and as well authorize that their would be only one distributor who will be the seller of their products or goods in a territory, a region or a Market is what is called EXCLUSIVE DISTRIBUTORSHIPS reason been that the manufacturer of such product want to know how good their products is in the territory and to get feedback from the customer about their products in order to take important action in a situation where their is lapses about their products.

Secondly in a situation where their is no INTERBRAND COMPETITION the EXCLUSIVE DISTRIBUTORSHIPS are been questioned reason been that INTERBRAND COMPETITION

occur when a manufacturer or producer of a products differentiate their products from other products that is sold in the same market where their products is been sold example of INTERBRAND COMPETITION is Mirinda drink versus Fanta

Therefore EXCLUSIVE DISTRIBUTORSHIPS are questioned when there is no interbrand competition.

answer; the inspector may have found some violation that could cause death or some kind of serious injury;

answer; vertical marketing system;