subject
Business, 31.12.2020 19:20 marlenerojas201

The Jones are a married couple and have always filed joint tax returns. On May 18, 2017, the couple was assessed with tax deficiencies for the 2015 tax year. The assessment relates to income paid to Mr. Jones which was not reported on the joint return. The couple’s accountant prepared the return. The couple reported $50,000 income for 2015. The amount of the income omitted was $200,000. Mrs. Jones is a homemaker. She admits that based on their lifestyle she thought the couple's income was approximately $100,000 ($50,000 more than reported). However she had limited access to her husband's financial documents and relied on the accountant. She claims she had no knowledge of the extent of the unreported income and assumed much of their income was non- taxable in nature. You should advise her that she:

a. Under no circumstances will she be responsible for any of the taxes due because an accountant prepared the return.
b. May be able to avoid liability to the extent she had no actual knowledge of the deficiency when filing the return. The burden of proof will be on the IRS.
c. May be able to avoid liability to the extent she had no reason to know of the deficiency (and did not have actual knowledge) when filing the return. The burden of proof will be on her.
d. None of the above.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Business

question
Business, 22.06.2019 12:30
Sales at a fast-food restaurant average $6,000 per day. the restaurant decided to introduce an advertising campaign to increase daily sales. to determine the effectiveness of the advertising campaign, a sample of 49 days of sales were taken. they found that the average daily sales were $6,300 per day. from past history, the restaurant knew that its population standard deviation is about $1,000. if the level of significance is 0.01, have sales increased as a result of the advertising campaign? multiple choicea)fail to reject the null hypothesis.b)reject the null hypothesis and conclude the mean is higher than $6,000 per day.c)reject the null hypothesis and conclude the mean is lower than $6,000 per day.d)reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the mean is equal to $6,000 per day.expert answer
Answers: 3
question
Business, 22.06.2019 14:30
Stella company sells only two products, product a and product b. product a product b total selling price $50 $30 variable cost per unit $20 $10 total fixed costs $2,110,000 stella sells two units of product a for each unit it sells of product b. stella faces a tax rate of 40%. stella desires a net afterminustax income of $54,000. the breakeven point in units would be
Answers: 3
question
Business, 22.06.2019 20:00
Modern firms increasingly rely on other firms to supply goods and services instead of doing these tasks themselves. this increased level of is leading to increased emphasis on management.
Answers: 2
question
Business, 22.06.2019 20:30
Almeda products, inc., uses a job-order costing system. the company's inventory balances on april 1, the start of its fiscal year, were as follows:
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
The Jones are a married couple and have always filed joint tax returns. On May 18, 2017, the couple...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 28.08.2019 16:20
question
History, 28.08.2019 16:20
question
Biology, 28.08.2019 16:20
question
History, 28.08.2019 16:20
Questions on the website: 13722367