Business, 17.01.2021 14:00 KillerSteamcar

1. How can tax on Pfizer's income be negative? Does it mean Pfizer saved that much money or they received that much amount from the government in Cash? 2. What is the effective rate of tax for Pfizer? Can it be negative? Why?
3. Give us brief details of what sort of tax benefits and tax expenses impacted FY 2017's Provision/(benefit) for taxes on income?

1. How can tax on Pfizer's income be negative? Does it mean Pfizer saved that much money or they re

Answers: 1

Show answers

Another question on Business

Business, 22.06.2019 04:00

Burberry is pursuing a focused differentiation strategy aimed at high-end luxury customers. however, the company is also employing a segmentation strategy to separate customers within that focus. the strategy offers items at an entry-level price point for customers who desire to be like celebrities such as sarah jessica parker as well as couture items for those richest and celebrity customers. what strategy is burberry pursuing?

Answers: 3

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 11:20

Lusk corporation produces and sells 14,300 units of product x each month. the selling price of product x is $25 per unit, and variable expenses are $19 per unit. a study has been made concerning whether product x should be discontinued. the study shows that $72,000 of the $102,000 in monthly fixed expenses charged to product x would not be avoidable even if the product was discontinued. if product x is discontinued, the annual financial advantage (disadvantage) for the company of eliminating this product should be:

Answers: 1

Answer

Business, 23.06.2019 00:00

How do the percentages of the 65 customer satisfaction ratings in that actually fall into the intervals [formula62.mml ± s], [formula62.mml ± 2s], and [formula62.mml ± 3s] compare to those given by the empirical rule? do these comparisons indicate that the statistical inferences you made in parts b and c are reasonably valid? (round your answers to the nearest whole number. omit the "%" sign in your

Answers: 2

Answer

Business, 23.06.2019 17:20

Consider two cigarette companies, pm inc. and brown inc. if neither company advertises, the two companies split the market and earn $50 million each. if they both advertise, they again split the market, but profits are lower by $10 million since each company must bear the cost of advertising. yet if one company advertises while the other does not, the one that advertises attracts customers from the other. in this case, the company that advertises earns $60 million while the company that does not advertise earns only $30 million. if these two companies collude and agree upon the best joint strategy, a. neither company will advertise. b. both companies will advertise. c. pm inc. will advertise but brown inc. will not. d. brown inc. will advertise but pm inc. will not.

Answers: 1

Answer

You know the right answer?

1. How can tax on Pfizer's income be negative? Does it mean Pfizer saved that much money or they rec...

Questions