F. Compose an essay that argues which health care system is better in terms of economics. Analyze the reasons for your determination by covering these points: •scarcity and allocation of resources
•incentives
•role of the government
•how prices are determined
•benefits and drawbacks for consumers in the UK and US
•benefits and drawbacks for producers in the UK and the US

Be sure to include specific reference to sources and a counterargument. Your essay should include an introduction, transitions, and a conclusion.

In terms of economics, I believe the US healthcare system is superior because it is private and has a lower wait time. Private healthcare, such as Medicare and Medicaid, provides services to certain portions of the population in the United States. Workers and health facilities are also private since they are private, whereas they are public in the UK. Another advantage of being private is that they can provide speedier treatment and more improved technology, which makes them highly dependable in the United States. This leads me to my second argument about how the times are shorter in the United States than in the United Kingdom. People in the United Kingdom may have to wait months, if not years, for some treatments. In the United States, the waiting period might be a few days or weeks.

Both healthcare systems have significant economic problems. Both the United States and the United Kingdom have healthcare issues. I can't tell which is better because I've only been treated in the United States, but after conducting the thorough study, I can honestly state that I prefer the United Kingdom's healthcare system. I'd rather cope with the issues of free healthcare than with the difficulties of excessively expensive healthcare. I haven't had to deal with the flaws in this system yet because of my age, but I'm sure I will.

The United States government prefers to spend its money elsewhere. Because of its free healthcare, the United Kingdom does not face this issue. That isn't to say it isn't plagued by other problems. Inefficiencies emerge because profit is not the primary motivation for the NHS, and prices do not play the same role as they do in a free market economy. Because of the strength of a competitive market, the right amount and quality of health care would be delivered at the lowest possible cost to fulfill customer demand. The NHS, on the other hand, is not in this situation. They expect physicians to behave in their best interests, but in a free market, this may not be the case.

The United States boasts one of the greatest medical research systems in the world. The NHS's major goal in the United Kingdom is to offer a high-quality service based on clinical need rather than the capacity to pay. It is also a major employer. It boosts the economy's production by keeping the workforce healthy. It also boosts GDP by increasing life expectancy and, as a result, the average working life. Finally, neither system is flawless, and whether you think the US healthcare system is superior to the UK's is entirely up to you. However, I believe that the system in place in the United Kingdom is superior. Despite the fact that some of them are destitute, their government genuinely cares about each and every one of them.

hi : ) i found this so i hope this !

"we first find value of tax in dollars.

the difference between the two prices   is: 23. 54 - 22 = 1.54

therefore the sales tax in dollars is 1.54

the tax % will be   (amount of tax / original cost price ) × 100

(1.54 / 22) × 100  → (0.07) × 100 =   7

so the tax rate is 7%

we can double check the answer.

7 % of 22   → (7/100) × 22 → 0.07 × 22 = 1.54

22 + 1.54 = 23.54"