Business, 01.02.2021 20:40 brookelynnxx

Suppose that Spain and Denmark both produce rye and stained glass. Spain's opportunity cost of producing a pane of stained glass is 4 bushels of rye while Denmark's opportunity cost of producing a pane of stained glass is 10 bushels of rye. By comparing the opportunity cost of producing wine in the two countries, you can tell that has a comparative advantage in the production of wine and has a comparative advantage in the production of rye.

Suppose that Spain and Denmark consider trading wine and rye with each other. Spain can gain from specialization and trade as long as it receives more than of rye for each bottle of wine it exports to Denmark. Similarly, Denmark can gain from trade as long as it receives more than of wine for each bushel of rye it exports to Spain.

Based on your answer to the last question, which of the following terms of trade (that is, price of wine in terms of rye) would allow both Denmark and Spain to gain from trade? Check all that apply.

a. 1 bushel of rye per bottle of wine
b. 8 bushels of rye per bottle of wine
c. 9 bushels of rye per bottle of wine
d. 3 bushels of rye per bottle of wine

Answers: 2

Show answers

Another question on Business

Business, 22.06.2019 11:10

The green fiddle has declared a $5 per share dividend. suppose capital gains are not taxed, but dividends are taxed at 15 percent. new irs regulations require that taxes be withheld at the time the dividend is paid. green fiddle stock sells for $71.50 per share, and the stock is about to go ex-dividend. what will the ex-dividend price be?

Answers: 2

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 14:30

Stella company sells only two products, product a and product b. product a product b total selling price $50 $30 variable cost per unit $20 $10 total fixed costs $2,110,000 stella sells two units of product a for each unit it sells of product b. stella faces a tax rate of 40%. stella desires a net afterminustax income of $54,000. the breakeven point in units would be

Answers: 3

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 21:00

Kendra knight took part in a friendly game of touch football. she had played before and was familiar with football. michael jewett was on her team. in the course of play, michael bumped into kendra and knocked her to the ground. he stepped on her hand, causing injury to a little finger that later required its amputation. she sued michael for damages. he defended on the ground that she had assumed the risk. kendra claimed that assumption of risk could not be raised as a defense because the state legislature had adopted the standard of comparative negligence. what happens if contributory negligence applies? what happens if the defense of comparative negligence applies?

Answers: 2

Answer

Business, 23.06.2019 07:40

If airlines do not change their prices how else might they try to compete with each other?

Answers: 3

Answer

You know the right answer?

Suppose that Spain and Denmark both produce rye and stained glass. Spain's opportunity cost of produ...

Questions