The trial balance of Wildcat Corporation included the following at December 31, 2021: Debits Credits Sales revenue 6,100,000 Interest revenue 41,000 Loss on sale of investments 20,000 Loss on debt investments 160,000 Gain on projected benefit obligation 270,000 Cost of goods sold 4,580,000 Selling expense 420,000 Restructuring costs 190,000 Interest expense 10,000 General and administrative expense 320,000 The loss on debt investments represents a decrease in the fair value of debt securities and is classified as part of other comprehensive income. Wildcat Corporation had 100,000 shares of stock outstanding throughout the year. Wildcat Corporation is subject to a 25% effective tax rate. Required: Prepare a 2021 multiple-step income statement for Wildcat Corporation with earnings per share disclosure. (Amounts to be deducted should be indicated with a minus sign. Round Earnings per share answer to 2 decimal places.)

David burdick is the ceo of acme bubblegum, a successful public company. as one of the cofounders of the company, burdick has enjoyed speaking and writing about the success of acme bubblegum for several years. typically, he speaks at conferences or directly to the press, but recently, he has been blogging about his firm anonymously. specifically, he defended a recent advertising campaign that was unpopular among consumers and pointedly attacked one of acme bubblegum’s competitors. burdick deeply enjoys his anonymous blogging and believes that none of his readers actually know that he works for acme bubblegum.should burdick be allowed to praise his company’s performance anonymously online? should he be allowed to attack his competitors without disclosing his relationship with the company? how would you feel if the ceo of a company at which you shopped was secretly writing criticisms of his or her competition? how would you feel if you knew a writer for your favorite blog was actually closely involved in a company that the blog discussed? 1. define the ethical issue? 2. who are the primary stakeholders? 3. what are the possible alternatives? 4. how could you evaluate the ethical implications of the alternative actions (use appropriate decision rules)? 5. what action would you recommend and why?