Suppose that Colombia imports cars from Australia. The free market price is $9,200.00 per car. If the tariff on imports in Colombia is initially 38%, Colombians pay per car. One of the accomplishments of the Uruguay Round that took place between 1986 and 1993 was significant across-the-board tariff cuts for industrial countries, as well as many developing countries. Suppose that as a result of the Uruguay Round, Colombia reduces its import tariffs to 19%. Assuming the price of cars is still $9,200.00 per car, consumers now pay the price of per car.
Based on the calculations and the scenarios presented, the Uruguay Round most likely in Colombia and in Australia.

1) Colombians pay $ 12,696,000 per car.

2) Consumers now pay the price of $10,948,000 per car.

Explanation:

1) Given that Colombia imports cars from Australia, and the free market price is $ 9,200.00 per car, if the tariff on imports in Colombia is initially 38%, Colombians pay $ 12,696,000 per car.

This arises from the following calculation:

9,200.00 x 1.38 = X

12.696.00 = X

2) Since that as a result of the Uruguay Round, Colombia reduces its import tariffs to 19%. Assuming the price of cars is still $ 9,200.00 per car, consumers now pay the price of $10,948,000 per car.

This arises from the following calculation:

9,200,000 x 1.19 = X

10,948,000 = X

answer; i do believe that the correct answer is (6) points in georgia;

one of the disadvantages of getting a government sponsored mortgage is they put a limit on the purchase price of the house. because the government is in charge of the mortage loan and terms, they are able to control how much money they are allowing someone to take out for the loan. not only are they incontrol, it's a lengthy process for a government sponsored mortgage.